10 years of int law continued botha olivier
10 years of international law, reveiew past and present case sa botha olovier
african border disputes and their settlement int law
arrest warrent – congo v belgium
arrest warrent case int law
charter of united nations
Diplomatic immunities and privilees act 2001
Draft articles on responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts
FOREIGN STATES IMMUNITIES ACT 87 OF 1981
geneva convention wounded and sick armed forces war
ILC articles of diplomatic protection
Kuanda v Pres of RSA
legal consequences of wall in occupied palestine territory
legality of threat or use of nuclear weapons
nduli v minister of justice
prosecutor v dusko tadic aka dule
protocol geneva convention protection of victims of non international armed conflicts
Reservations To The Convention On The Prevention And Punishment Of The crime of genocide
s v ebrahim
Van Deventer v Hancke and Mossop
van Zyl v gov of south africa
child act 2005
Dissenting Van den Wyngaert opinion
Leibowitz and others
States immunity article
Ten years of IL in Sa courts
Thanks Yo, think I’m gonna do this module for the heck of it during the semester break.
good luck with that 🙂
I would like to inquire about legal internship position options whilst studying towards an LLB trough Unisa. What are the requirements, the best way to find vacancies and for which type of positions can one apply. All the internship positions I have found thus far requires the former completion of a LLB, though I know it is possible to intern from your 2nd year of studying LLB. Please advice and share information/thoughts.
only unisa can answer these questions. i have no idea of their internal policy concerning internships.
Hi just a quick question please. I’m kinda battling to answer this question and not really sure what is required. The question is: both natural law followers and positivists have developed theories attempting to explain the nature of the sources of international law . Describe what points of criticism you would bring against each paradigm’s theory and explain why. …… Any help would be appreciated . Thanks
This is an interesting question. When they ask for criticism. What is it that they mean? To criticise? To point out flaws in each theory? A vexing question indeed. Have you done jurisprudence?
No not yet
Tammy. Do jurisprudence. I’m sure will find ur answer
Hi, do you perhaps have old afrikaans tut.
Im doing this subject next week and im very behind. Is there anyone with summaries or extra notes that can help me. I will really be forever greatful. My cell number is 0849114024 and my email is firstname.lastname@example.org Thank you in advance.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Law graduate, artist and avid golfer.
View Full Profile →
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 3,152 other followers